A troubling movement inciting violence against President Donald Trump, the 47th U.S. President, has emerged in the U.S., sparked by a former FBI agent’s Instagram post featuring seashells arranged as “8647”. Interpreted as a coded call to “eliminate” Trump, the symbol 8647 has fueled online unrest and a memecoin surge, prompting alarm over political extremism.
Decoding the “8647” Symbol and Its Spread
In recent weeks, a cryptic Instagram post by a former FBI agent displaying seashells arranged to form “8647” has ignited controversy across U.S. online communities. According to Cassell’s Dictionary of Slang, “86” is slang for “to eliminate” or “kill,” while “47” refers to Donald Trump, the 47th U.S. President.
The image, widely shared on platforms like X, has been interpreted by some as a coded incitement to assassinate Trump, who returned to office in January 2025.
WOW!
Former FBI Director James Comey @Comey just posted this on his Instagram 2 hours ago, with the caption “cool shell formation on my beach walk”. It’s a pic of shells in the form of “86 47”.
This is a call for the assassination of President Trump by the former FBI Director! pic.twitter.com/Q4qIBbvvmt
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) May 15, 2025
No mainstream outlet, such as Reuters or AP News, has confirmed the movement’s scale or direct ties to organized violence, and the former FBI agent’s identity remains unverified.
Read more: TRUMP Memecoin Price Prediction from April to May, 2025
The symbol’s virality underscores the power of social media to amplify ambiguous messages, especially in a polarized political climate.
Memecoin $8647 Surge 600%
Adding to the controversy, a memecoin named $8647 emerged shortly after the post gained traction, reportedly surging 600% in value within 24 hours on May 16, 2025, according to Dexscreener. The token, likely created to capitalize on the buzz, raises concerns about profiteering from divisive narratives.
Source: Dexscreener
Memecoins tied to political figures, like TRUMP or $MAGA, have historically fueled speculation, but $8647’s rapid rise alarms experts due to its association with violent rhetoric. Such tokens often exploit fleeting controversies, risking financial losses for retail investors.
The incident highlights ongoing challenges in policing online extremism, especially when symbols can be weaponized. Without concrete evidence of a coordinated plot, authorities face a delicate balance between monitoring threats and avoiding panic.
